This method of aircraft performance comparison was developed in the 1960's. The F-15 Eagle was the first US fighter designed and developed using E-M diagrams, also know as "doghouse" plots due to their shape, as a primary design trade-off tool. Doghouse plots are today's fighter pilot's "bible". They tell him how his aircraft will perform in the within visual range (WVR) fight, and given an E-M plot of the threat, will show him where he wants to fight the enemy to maximize his strengths and minimize those of his adversary.
Ok, so what are these plots showing you. The blue line is the maximum
instantaneous turn capability of the aircraft across its airspeed range for
the given altitude and weight. Power setting really has no effect on this
for these aircraft. The apex of the curve occurs at the slowest speed where
you can generate the aircraft's limit normal load factor, ie G limit. This
airspeed is the instantaneous corner velocity. The portion of the curve to
the left of the apex defines the lift limit, ie the aircraft will stall
(reach its lift limit) before it reaches its G limit. The curved portion of
the curve to the right of the apex is the G limit. This defines the maximum
normal load factor the aircraft is rated for at the given weight. The
straight vertical portion of the blue line on the right hand side defines the
maximum level flight speed. This is a cluge on my part, because that line
should really be the maximum speed (ie do not exceed speed) for the given
altitude. However, I didn't have that data so I just used maximum level
flight speed instead, so sue me
You'll probably notice that the A6M5a Zero is not included. That's because
when I backed the data out it said it was doing 18g. Sorry, I think there's
an error in the AW manual data
I haven't verified this data, I just applied the necessary equations to the
data given in the AW manual to back this stuff out. The whole reason I did this
was because I felt AW's flight model was close enough to the real thing that it was
worthwhile. I know there are some problems with how they model the stall, so
the left side of the doghouse may not always come out right, especially if
you make very abrupt stick inputs. I also know the aircraft doesn't break at
the G limits depicted. It's not supposed to, not in real life (tm) anyway,
you a 1.5 safety margin in real life (tm). I do think this gives you a
better idea of how the aircraft compare. I was sold on the validity when I
saw the Ki-84 data. I knew I love that aircraft for a reason. It turns up
its own butt just like the F-16 :).
Anyway, if anyone finds any major glaring errors or has suggestions, don't
hesitate to contact me. I hope to get more data from Kesmai to do this up
right, and also do some overlay comparisons later.
Stuart Butts, #6333
EM Diagrams - Doghouse plots
Last modified: Mon Sep 19 20:39:51 CDT 1994
Jim Knutson (Red Beard), knutson@cactus.org